Let’s talk about the cost of a stand-up meeting.
Here in the San Francisco Bay Area, a senior programmer can make $300,000/year or more. Starting salaries are more around $175K. Let’s average at $250K to make the math easy. (Adjust the numbers for your own locale, of course.)
Your cost to the company is higher than your salary. People typically use a “load factor” multiplier to convert from what you pay an employee to their actual cost to the company (which includes benefits, HR costs, stock options, etc.). When I was a CTO, I used a 2x load factor.
So, the “fully-loaded” cost of a senior programmer is $500K/year. There are about 250 workdays in a year—2,000 hours—so that fully loaded salary comes to $250/hour. That’s how much you cost the company.
That “15-minute” standup takes an hour when you factor in conversations after the meeting, context-swap overhead, and other distractions. (Context-swap overhead alone, including time to return to a flow state, counts for about 20 minutes.)
$250/person * 5 people/team * 10 teams * 250 workdays/year == $3,125,000. That’s million, with an m.
If you use a collaborative-working technique like mob/ensemble programming instead of scatter-gather, you don’t need a standup. So, using mob/ensemble programming saves the company $3M/year on that single factor alone. (It’s actually more when you factor in the time value of money, as any good MBA would do.)
I am not saying, by the way, “do what you’re doing now, but without standups.” That obviously won’t work. I am saying, “There are ways of working that do not require standups; consider using them.” That is, you need to change the way that you do the work to make dropping a standup feasible.
Worth thinking about.
“Require” being an operative word. In the day of agile theater (doing things consultants told you were part of a framework but don’t create nimble-ness) there are not many that actually use the time as a valuable huddle. My wife and I, however, use this all the time and it’s amazing. I almost get the sense from your post that this chat is at best awful or should be dumped. You may be right. It’s only valuable for teams that don’t need it but like it and get a benefit…as are all things.